A considerable amount of current conversation in the area of big data and analytics focuses on the virtues of solving all the challenges that organizations face when using this new paradigm in the business world. There is also a lot of discussion around the technology-related issues that impact achieving big data and analytics goals.
What hasn’t gotten the attention that it merits, however, is the role of business leadership and how thought leaders need to raise the stakes to become not only well versed in analytics, but to build big data and analytics literacy throughout their organizations. They need a heightened awareness of analytics if they are going to effectively drive analytics strategies and outcomes for their organizations and become true leaders in this area by all relevant measures.
The following three significant findings from “Analytics: A Blueprint for Value,” an IBM Institute for Business Value Study,1 align with this point of view:
Senior executives and business managers should aspire to create the core competencies and to develop analytical insights that enable them to become big data and analytics leaders within their industries. Education, mentorship, and consultation with outside advisors should be implemented to gain the knowledge necessary to attain a leadership role. For example, a number of consultancies provide services such as those available from the IBM Business Analytics and Optimization services and Information Agenda teams.2
When selecting a consultancy, business leaders should choose one that can advise, mentor, and support based on specific needs and levels of maturity, as opposed to those that may take a force-fit approach that essentially attempts to force a round peg methodology into a square peg environment. And a good grasp of numbers in respect to numerical literacy is also important in this age of fact-based decision making based on insights derived from large volumes of data.
Numerical literacy means acceptable levels of working knowledge and experience in decision science in which analytical techniques such as statistical and descriptive analysis, forecasting, and performance management can be applied. In addition, moving from a gut-based decision model to a fact-based one requires both cultural change as well as the tools and know-how required to create and manage the facts themselves. Finance teams can typically be the source of such competencies, and they can be used as a center for fostering and developing these competencies across the enterprise.
Today’s executives and managers are trained primarily in operations, finance, marketing, and sales, along with a bit of strategy thrown in for good measure. While a significant number of senior executives in the US have advanced degrees in their field of expertise, few have been formally trained in information management, analytics, or decision science. Yet, virtually none have been schooled in decision science, information theory, analytics, or risk management. Lack of training in these areas creates a dilemma for those organizations that want to focus on big data and analytics but do not have experienced leaders who can lead from a position of domain expertise.
Big data and analytics success should be driven by the business, and more importantly from the ranks of its senior executives and managers—not from the bottom up or from the IT function. The inherent accountability for all strategic initiatives is at the very top of the organization and cascades down and across to business managers at various levels who then have responsibilities for its execution within their area of control. Organizations today remain hierarchical in both structure and cultural behavior. To change either of these structures requires engaged and competent senior executive teams that are committed to the outcome and can influence and align behaviors to support it.
To achieve these competencies without formal education or hands-on experience requires consultation with outside mentors and advisors who can work hand in hand with the entire senior executive team. These advisors help ground the team in both the science and the pragmatics required to achieve successful big data and analytics outcomes that can be applied pervasively across the organization. This approach—some call it the “charm school” approach—can be characterized by a close collaboration among all parties involved. It can rapidly accelerate the process of nondisruptively developing the senior executive team’s big data and analytics expertise and competency to maximize strategic outcomes.
A number of organizations have come to this realization already. They’re now engaging with management consultancies and analytics boutiques to address their shortcomings and accelerate results from their big data and analytics strategies. Alongside these mentoring activities, organizational leadership is strongly advised to consider organizational structures and change readiness as complementary endeavors. They can help illuminate the revisions to structure and Organizational Change Management (OCM) activities required to bring the entire organization up to a minimum level of analytics acumen and competency. These accompanying measures can also bring cohesion to the entire big data and analytics strategy and the pursuit of its outcomes.
Please share any thoughts or questions in the comments.
IBM big data in a minute: Bringing the power of Hadoop to the enterprise
Video: The right tool for the job
Nature of analytics video: IBM and the swan of all fears
IBM redesigns its Big Data & Analytics website with IBM Watson Foundations capabilities
Visit a website with comprehensive resources dedicated to the chief data officer role
Podcast: Learn about the InfoSphere Streams project at GitHub